Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Motiprabha Infrated Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (ITAT Patna)
Appeal Number : Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16792 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/12/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Motiprabha Infrated Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (ITAT Patna)

Undisputedly, minimum statutory period of 30 days mandated under the provisions of Section 74(A) of CGST/BGST Act, 2017 was not afforded to the petitioner for making payment due and prior to the expiry of 30 days, the assessing officer proceeded to pass the order, ex parte in nature. The notice dated 15.02.2021 directed the petitioner to file reply on 21st of February, 2021 which was within the period of 30 days. It is the mandate of law that 30 days’ period has to be afforded to the parties, which was not done in the instant case.

As such, on this ground alone, we quash the notice dated 15.02.2021 as also the order of assessment dated 24.02.202 1  with the direction to the assessing officer to issue a fresh notice in the light of the statutory provisions and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT PATNA

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031