Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Sharma Transports (GST AAR Karnataka)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Sharma Transports (GST AAR Karnataka)

Whether the revenue earned through the “operation and maintenance of employee commutation vehicles and transportation services agreement” be classified under heading passenger transport services with SAC 9964 (vi) liable to tax at 5% (CGST + SGST) without input or 12% (CGST + SGST) with input credit or under rental services of transport services with SAC 9966 (i) liable to tax at 5% (CGST + SGST) without input or 12% (CGST+SGST) with input credit or any other rate.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

3 Comments

  1. jasmeen1989 says:

    Hello,

    I have an query!

    Our company is registered in Delhi and providing transportation service to another company which is registered in Haryana. Our service is pick and drop service for employees, where we are picking them from various locations and dropping them to the office premises and vice a versa. What shall be place of supply in this case, also we are under agreement with the company.

  2. Avinash says:

    In para 8.7 of the order, applicant i.e transporter company has been referred as ‘renter’ while renter is a person who has taken something on rent and in present case the client i.e Volvo Group. Owing to
    this mistake, the Advance Ruling has been given on wrong premise and need to be reexamined by AAR

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31