Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Goods and Services Tax
  3. Judiciary

Notification no. 14/2022-Central Tax inserting explanation in rule 89 of CGST Rules has prospective effect

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tata Steel Limited Vs Union of India (Jharkhand High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts Jharkhand High Court
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Tata Steel Limited Vs Union of India (Jharkhand High Court)

Jharkhand High Court held that the explanation inserted in Rule 89 (4) of CGST Rules, 2017 vide Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Tags:

Kindly Refer to Privacy Policy & Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

Author Bio

Name: POONAM GANDHI
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: N/A
Location: AHMEDABAD, Gujarat, India
Member Since: 14 Feb 2019 | Total Posts: 6673
View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penalties imposed by NCDRC are regulatory & not constitute debt under IBC: SC Section 272A(2)(e) Penalty order quashed as not passed within reasonable time: ITAT Bangalore Family Jewellery & Silver Articles Not Unexplained Assets: ITAT Jaipur Delhi HC dismisses Writ as Domestic Industry Drops Anti-Dumping Duty Demand Charger Not Taxable Separately When Sold With Phone Under Single MRP: SC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates

Featured Posts

View All Featured Posts
Sponsored

Popular Posts

Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31