Notification no. 14/2022-Central Tax inserting explanation in rule 89 of CGST Rules has prospective effect

POONAM GANDHI 09 Sep 2023 2,430 Views 0 comment Print Goods and Services Tax | Judiciary

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tata Steel Limited Vs Union of India (Jharkhand High Court)

Related Assessment Year :

Courts : All High Courts Jharkhand High Court

Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Sponsored

Tata Steel Limited Vs Union of India (Jharkhand High Court)

Jharkhand High Court held that the explanation inserted in Rule 89 (4) of CGST Rules, 2017 vide Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Tags:

Kindly Refer to Privacy Policy & Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

Author Bio

Name: POONAM GANDHI

Qualification: CA in Practice

Company: N/A

Location: AHMEDABAD, Gujarat, India

Member Since: 14 Feb 2019 | Total Posts: 6673

View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penalties imposed by NCDRC are regulatory & not constitute debt under IBC: SC Section 272A(2)(e) Penalty order quashed as not passed within reasonable time: ITAT Bangalore Family Jewellery & Silver Articles Not Unexplained Assets: ITAT Jaipur Delhi HC dismisses Writ as Domestic Industry Drops Anti-Dumping Duty Demand Charger Not Taxable Separately When Sold With Phone Under Single MRP: SC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Sponsored

ITAT Quashes Reassessment Due to Discrepancy in Reasons Provided

Weekly newsletter from Chairman, CBIC dated 17/03/2025

Year-End Financial Checklist: Compliance & CA’s Role

What are the best Practices for Protecting Your Digital Assets

ITAT Pune Directs CIT(A) to Decide Appeal on Merit

New Section 194T TDS Rules: Impact on Taxpayers, Effective April 2025

All about Input Service Distributor and Manner of Distribution of credit

Section 271C Penalty applies to both Non-Deduction & Non-Payment of TDS: Kerala HC

Supreme Court Rejects 1011-Day Delay in Second Appeal

Bombay HC: Unexplained Bank Credits Taxable under Sec 68, Orders Probe into Accommodation Entry Racket

View All Posts

Sponsored

Year-End Financial Checklist: Compliance & CA’s Role

CBDT FAQs on Revised Guidelines for Compounding Offences

Key Tax Tasks to Complete Before March 31, 2025

Key Income Tax Changes for Partnership Firms Starting April 1, 2025

Analysis of Notifications and Circulars for Week ending 16th March 2025

Empanelment of CA Firms for Concurrent Audit by IDBI Bank

No section 271C penalty for mere delay in TDS remittance: ITAT Ahmedabad

One Year, Multiple Litigations: Delhi HC Orders Immediate GST Refund, Ends Assesses Agony

Kumbh Mela – “Religious Place”- New Saga of GST Litigation

Pendency of 5,49,042 Appeals Before CIT(A)/NFAC: Request for Early Disposal

View All Featured Posts

Sponsored

Statutory and Tax Compliance Calendar for March 2025

March 2025 Tax Compliance Deadlines for Income Tax and GST

Bank of Baroda invites EOI for Concurrent Auditors Appointment

Empanelment of CA Firms for Concurrent Audit by IDBI Bank

Empanelment of Stock & Receivable Auditors with UCO Bank

ICAI Guidance Note on Audit of Banks (2025 Edition)

ICAI Empanelment to act as Observers at Examination Centres

GST Amnesty Scheme for Section 73 cases

TDS Rates Chart for FY 2025-26 (AY 2026-27)

GST Major Amnesty Scheme under Section 128A: No Interest No Penalty

Search Post by Date

Enter your email Address

Case Law Details

Tata Steel Limited Vs Union of India (Jharkhand High Court)

Tags:

Author Bio

Name: POONAM GANDHI

Qualification: CA in Practice

Company: N/A

Location: AHMEDABAD, Gujarat, India

Member Since: 14 Feb 2019 | Total Posts: 6673

My Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Subscribe to Our Daily Newsletter

Latest Posts

Featured Posts

Popular Posts