Case Law Details
Tile Bros Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court)
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court addressed the case of Tile Bros versus the Assistant Commissioner (ST). The issue at hand involved the failure of the Assistant Commissioner to follow the principles of natural justice while issuing a tax demand order. The petitioner, Tile Bros, challenged the original order dated August 31, 2023, on grounds of improper communication and lack of detailed information in the show cause notice.
The core of the dispute lies in the procedural lapses observed by the court. Tile Bros contended that the impugned order, as well as prior communications, were only uploaded to the GST portal and not properly conveyed to the petitioner through other means. This led to the petitioner being unaware of the proceedings, thereby violating the principles of natural justice.
1. Communication Failures: The petitioner argued that the intimation, show cause notice, and the final impugned order were only made available on the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal. The lack of direct communication hindered the petitioner from responding appropriately.
2. Inadequate Details in Show Cause Notice: The petitioner’s counsel pointed out the absence of specific details regarding the tax proposal in the show cause notice. This lack of clarity further contributed to the petitioner’s inability to prepare an adequate response.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
