Case Law Details
Cherakulam Towers & Highway Resort Vs Assistant Commissioner (Kerala High Court)
Introduction: In a recent judgment by the Kerala High Court, Cherakulam Towers & Highway Resort sought relief through a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The case revolves around the immediate deposit of 20% of the disputed tax to halt revenue recovery in their Value Added Tax (VAT) appeal. The petition raises concerns related to the delay in the disposition of a stay petition and an appeal petition, as well as the suspension of recovery proceedings.
Detailed Analysis:
1. Background of the Case: Cherakulam Towers & Highway Resort initiated a writ petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to seek specific reliefs. These included urging the 2nd Respondent to promptly pass orders on their stay petition (Exhibit-P4) and their appeal petition (Exhibit-P3). The petitioner also requested the court to direct the 3rd Respondent to suspend recovery proceedings in connection with the Revenue Recovery notice (Exhibit-P5) until the finalization of the appeal. The petitioner further sought to dispense with the filing of a translation of the vernacular document.
2. Lack of Pre-Deposit: The crucial point of contention in the case was the absence of a pre-deposit by the petitioner while filing the second appeal before the 2nd respondent. Typically, a pre-deposit is a monetary amount that an appellant is required to deposit as a condition for pursuing an appeal.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
