Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Softouch Health Care Private Ltd. Vs. State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number : WP(C). No.15297 OF 2020(J)
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/09/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Softouch Health Care Private Ltd. Vs. State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court)

The issue under consideration is whether the best judgement assessment can be set aside by filing revised return beyond specified time period?

High Court state that the returns in respect of the period aforementioned were filed beyond the period of one month stipulated under Section 62 of the Act. Therefore, the petitioner cannot aspire for the benefit of getting the assessment orders passed on best judgment basis set aside, as contemplated under Section 62 of the Act. The remedy of the petitioner against the said assessment orders lies in approaching the statutory appellate authority against the said orders. HC, therefore, dismiss the writ petition in its challenge against the assessment orders without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to move the first appellate authority in its challenge against the said assessment orders.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT

The petitioner, a private limited company engaged in providing ayurvedic and spa services, is an assessee under the provisions of the GST Act. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the assessment orders that were passed for the period from April 2018 to October 2019 on best judgment basis under Section 62 of the CGST Act. It is the contention of the petitioner that within the statutorily permitted period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the said assessment orders under Section 62, the petitioner preferred separate returns for the various months as aforementioned and also filed applications for rectification of errors apparent on the face of the assessment orders that was served on him. It is his contention in the writ petition that in view of the returns subsequently filed within the period permitted under Section 62, Ext.P1 series of assessment orders had to be withdrawn as contemplated under the said Section.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031