Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shapoorji paloonji & Co.Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India (Jharkhand High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shapoorji Paloonji & Co. Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India (Jharkhand High Court)

The Hon’ble Court issues notice on the challenge to the vires of Rule 118 being contrary to section 142(11)(c) of the CGST Act.

Petitioner is a works contractor. It received advance. It paid service tax on such advances after 01.07.2017. It claimed credit of the same in form Trans-1. Revenue denied and demanded reversal with interest and penalty. Revenue contends that in terms of Rule 118 of the CGST Rules credit can be allowed only of such service tax/VAT paid before

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31