Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rohit Mehta Vs Superintendent (Preventive) (Punjab and Haryana High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rohit Mehta Vs Superintendent (Preventive) (Punjab and Haryana High Court) The contention on behalf of the respondent- Department is that the day of remand is to be excluded while calculating the sixty days period. In view thereof 28.11.2021 would be the Sixtieth day, the same day the complaint had been filed. The application of the petitioner for default bail filed on 28.11.2021 could not have been allowed. The petitioner as also the respondents have relied on a number of decisions. It is not deemed necessary to refer to them. All that needs to be noticed is that taking note the conflicting v...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930