Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

HC denies bail in fraud of 3 crore by Fabrication of GST Number & Firm name

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2023 taxguru.in 2199
Case Name
Sheetal Mittal Vs State of Rajasthan (Rajasthan High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Sheetal Mittal Vs State of Rajasthan (Rajasthan High Court)

Denial of Anticipatory Bail in case where GST Number and Firm Name were fabricated

The Hon’ble Supreme court in the matter of Sheetal Mittal Etc. v. The State of Rajasthan & Anr. Etc. [Special Leave to Appeal Crl. Nos. 5491-5500/2023 dated May 12, 2023] held that anticipatory bail cannot be granted if a taxpayer fabricates the firm name and GST number and other details were found to be non-existent.

Facts:

Sheetal Mittal and Padam (“the Petitioners”) are engaged in the trade and business at Delhi and received certain goods from the accused Harsh Garg and Sarvesh. The Petitioners contended that the crime in question is purely of civil nature, and it is a case of alleged non-payment of dues and not that of cheating and like offences, so the bail should be granted.

State of Rajasthan and Anr. (“the Respondents”) vehemently and fervently opposed the bail application and submitted that the documents submitted by the accused-petitioners during the course of investigation were found to the fabricated as the GST number, name of the firm and other details were found to be non-existent.

The Respondents further contend that accused petitioners submitted a forged bill indicating the purchase of the recovered clothes, and further the investigation also reveals that accused Harsh Garg and Sarvesh purchased the clothes from the complainants and after inducing them to deliver the goods, supplied the clothes to the petitioners and petitioners illegally sold the same goods in the market, thus accused-petitioners along with accused Harsh Garg and Sarvesh duped the complainants and causing them loss in tune to approximately rupees three crores.

The Hon’ble High Court of Rajasthan, in this case, held that an investigation against the accused person is still pending, and custodial investigation may further lead to recovery and disclosure of facts for the allegedly misappropriated goods and hence, declined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Aggrieved by the decision of the Hon’ble High court, Petitioners seeks Special Leave to Appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

Issue:

Whether fabrication of documents can be a cause for the denial of anticipatory bail?

Held:

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in [Special Leave to Appeal Crl. Nos. 5491-5500/2023] held as under:

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

Bimal Jain
Name: Bimal Jain
Qualification: LL.B / Advocate
Company: A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Location: Delhi, Delhi
Articles Published: 2,897

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.