Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

HC admits Writ challenging constitutional validity of Section 129 & 130 of CGST Act, 2017

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2018 taxguru.in 2201
Case Name
Shan Mohammad Vs. Union of India & Ors. (Rajasthan High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Shan Mohammad Vs. Union of India & Ors. (Rajasthan High Court)

By way of this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the constitutional validity of the provisions of Section 129 & 130 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and the corresponding Sections of the Rajasthan Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017.

Section 129 of Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 deals with Detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit and Section 130 contains provision for Confiscation of goods or conveyances and levy of penalty.

The Petition was argued by Mr. Pankaj Ghiya with Ms. Priyamvada Joshi on the grounds of it being arbitrary, unreasonable and contrary to the spirit of the Constitution. The Division Bench of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Goverdhan Bardhar on 04.12.2018 admitted the same. Notices were issued. The Respondents i.e. the learned Additional Solicitor General were directed to seek instructions and file reply to the Writ Petition.

Download Copy of Writ filed with Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court

Download Copy of High Court Order

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.