Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

GSTR-3B─Return notified  subsequent to Judgment of Gujarat HC to nullify Judgment─No analysis of this crucial aspect by the Apex Court

The Hon’ble Supreme court in the case of Union of India v. AAP And Company (2021) 36 J.K.Jain’s GST & VR 519, overruled the judgment dated 24.6.2019 of Hon’ble Gujarat HC : AAP and Co. v. Union of India &  Ors. (2019) J. K. Jain’s GST & VR 1.

The judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court neither discussed the crucial aspect of substitution of rule 61(5), retrospectively w.e.f.1.7.2017, categorising GSTR-3B as a return u/s 39 of CGST Act, vide notfn No.49/2019-CT dated 9.10.2019, after delivery of the judgment of Gujarat HC dated 24.6.2019 nor commented upon this subsequent amendment by CBIC, before overruling the judgment of Gujarat HC. The CBIC amended Rule 61(5) to nullify the judgment of Gujarat HC.

Furter, the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme court was based on Obitur Dicta narrated in the case of Union of India v. Bharti Airtel Ltd. & Ors (2021) 36 J.K.Jain’s GST & VR 369, which is against all cannons of law laid down previously by the Hon’ble Supreme court in a No. of cases.

GSTR-3B Return notified to nullify Gujarat HC Judgment - SC fails to analyze this crucial aspect

How the subsequent amendment dated 9.10.2019, that too, by way of amendment in rules, after pronouncement of the judgment of Hon’ble Gujarat HC dated 24.6.2019 can be used to reverse the judgment delivered previously. Even the Senior Advocate appeared in the supreme court, could not discuss this crucial aspect before the judges of the Supreme court inspite of ample opportunity given by the Hon’ble Supreme court.

Inspite of all this, it is the New & Unique Ratio decidendi given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court by overruling the judgment dated 24.6.2019 of Hon’ble Gujarat HC and legalised subsequent amendment carried out by CBIC in rule 61(5), retrospectively.

It tantamounts to a non speaking order of the Apex Court based on Obiter Dicta.

I have covered all the above crucial aspects in my analysis given in the magazine (2021) 36 J.K.Jain’s GST & VR 519.

Sponsored

Author Bio

I am s/o J.K.Jain , Jaipur & is Writer & Analyst of Fortnightly magazine "J.K.Jain's GST & VR". Extended Consultation work of GST. Expert in Commentary of GST/VAT. My e-mail ID is [email protected] & Tel No. is 9414300730/9462749040/0141-3584043. Analytical interpretation of GS View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Judgment Analysis: GST on Royalty in Mining Case Royalty Collection Contractor – Levy of GST- Constitutional Validity of Condition in notfn 14/2018-CT(R) GST on Royalty on Minerals excavated from Mines – Constitutional Validity Delayed submission of Reconciliation Statement in GSTR-9C – Late Fee/Penalty not leviable Affiliation granted for imparting education is not exempt View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031