Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re M/s. VFS Global Services Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. GST-ARA-16/2019-20/B-109
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/10/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re M/s. VFS Global Services Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra)

Whether the work for ‘Operating Citizen Facilitation Centre (CFC) at various Locations of MCGM on per transaction/receipt basis’ involving the aforesaid Scope of Work would be exempt from GST vide Sr. No.3 & 3A of amended Notification No. 12/2017  – Central (Rate) as on 31st Dec, 2018.

From a perusal of the contract submitted by the applicant, we do not agree with the applicant that the supply by them to MCGM is a composite supply of service. The contract very clearly states that the agreement between Mr. Anil Katoch of M/s VFS Global Services Private Limited and Shri Sitaram Kunte, Municipal Commissioner, is for the work of Operating Citizen Facilitation Centres / Collection Centres at various Locations of MCGM for 5 years on per transactions basis at Rs.29.45 (Rupees twenty nine and paise forty five only) per transaction for pilot period of two months and thereafter for five years. The contract nowhere specifies separately for supply of goods, namely, computers, other consumables, etc. Therefore we find that the computers, other consumables, etc are being used by the applicant on their own account and that too for the purpose of providing services for the work of Operating Citizen Facilitation Centres / Collection Centres at various Locations of MCGM. Hence we find that their supply is of services only and are in the nature of pure services. However we agree to their submission that their role starts only after MCGM has provided services to citizens for which periodical bills/invoices are issued by MCGM. The role of the applicant starts only after the supply of goods/services are rendered by MCGM and hence it cannot be said that they are rendering service by way of any activity in relation to any function entrusted to a Municipality under article 243W of the Constitution.

FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA

PROCEEDINGS

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031