Case Law Details
Kronos Solutions India Private Limited Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court)
Introduction: The Allahabad High Court recently rendered a crucial judgment in the case of Kronos Solutions India Private Limited vs Union of India, focusing on a CGST appeal against an order by the Adjudicating Authority. The petitioner contested the decision of the Joint Director (CGST) (Appeals), Noida, dated 21.2.2023, urging that it violated Section 107(11) of the CGST Act, 2017.
Detailed Analysis: The heart of the matter lies in the power of the Appellate Authority to remand the case to the Adjudicating Authority. Section 107(11) explicitly outlines three options for the Appellate Authority: confirm, modify, or annul the order under appeal. The legislative intent is clear – no inherent power allows the Appellate Authority to set aside the order and remand the proceedings to the original authority.
In this case, the impugned order partially allowed the appeal and remanded the matter to the original adjudicating authority for de novo adjudication. The court, after considering Section 107(11), concluded that the appeal authority failed to exercise its jurisdiction in accordance with the law. The legislative provision prohibits the referral of the case back to the adjudicating authority, and any deviation from this mandate renders the order unsustainable.
The judgment underscores the significance of adhering to statutory prescriptions and emphasizes that the appeal authority must choose from the specified options without the authority to remand the case. The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the appeal authority for a fresh decision after affording a fair hearing to the parties involved.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
