GST advance ruling cannot be sought on activity undertaken in Past

By editor3 Goods and Services Tax Judiciary January 31, 2019

Case Name: In reShyam Singh Champawat, M/s Laxmi Machinery Store (GST AAR Rajasthan)
Appeal Number: Only available for paid members
Date of Judgement/Order: Only available for paid members
Courts: AAR Rajasthan, Advance Rulings

Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

In re Shyam Singh Champawat, M/s Laxmi Machinery Store (GST AAR Rajasthan) The questions sought by the applicant are related to activity undertaken in past-period thus not eligible for advance ruling as per Section 95(a) of CGST/RGST Act, 2017 and hence no ruling is given. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING,RAJASTHAN Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. The Issue r...

This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.