Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

No denial of ITC merely because supplier failed to file returns & pay taxes

Advertisement


Subhash Singh Vs Deputy Commissioner (Uttarakhand High Court)

The Hon’ble Uttarakhand High Court in Subhash Singh v. Deputy Commissioner, SGST [Special Appeal No. 100 of 2024 dated May 03, 2024] has modified the assessment order passed earlier against the purchasing dealer on condition of depositing 10% of the amount demanded and further observed that proceedings under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) should not ideally be instituted against the purchasing dealer for availing the benefit of ITC since the same has not been availed in a fraudulent manner.

Facts:

Subhash Singh (“the Appellant”) is engaged in the retail and wholesale business of iron scrap and waste with its principal place of business, District Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand.

The Appellant had purchased goods with proper invoices and made proper payments through banking channels along with applicable GST. The details of the invoices and the payment of GST have been recorded in the Appellant’s books of accounts.

The supplier of the Appellant, “M/s Dev Bhoomi Spat”, had received GST from the Appellant when they had supplied their goods to the Appellant’s company, and the Appellant, in this backdrop, had rightly availed the input tax credit for the tax period April 2021 to March 2022.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

Bimal Jain
Name: Bimal Jain
Qualification: LL.B / Advocate
Company: A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Location: Delhi, Delhi
Articles Published: 2,891

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.