DGAP cannot suo motu issue a notice requiring a company to submit information on all its products

Reckitt Benckiser India Private Limited Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court)

Grievance of the Petitioner is that Director General of Anti Profiteering (DGAP) has by the impugned notice dated 8^th/9^th April, 2019 sought information on all products of the Petitioner. In this context, he has referred to the recent amendment by which Sub-Rule 5 (a) has been inserted after Sub-Rule 4 in Rule 133 of thePlease become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.