This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Bail Can’t Be Refused on Mere Evidence Tampering Apprehension in GST Case
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Prathipati Teene Venkayamma and Others Vs State Of Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Pradesh High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Andhra Pradesh HC
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Prathipati Teene Venkayamma and Others Vs State Of Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Pradesh High Court)
Introduction: In a significant legal development, the Andhra Pradesh High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in the case of Prathipati Teene Venkayamma and Others Vs State Of Andhra Pradesh. The court’s decision underscores the principle that mere apprehension of tampering with prosecution evidence cannot serve as valid grounds for refusing bail. This ruling comes amidst allegations of wrongful claims of GST Input Tax Credit (ITC) by Avexa Corporation Private Limited (ACPL) and o...
Author Info
