Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Hyco Enterprises (GST AAR Haryana)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. HAR/HAAR/R/2019-20/21
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/08/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : AAR Haryana (83) Advance Rulings (1751)

In re Hyco Enterprises (GST AAR Haryana)

In order to decide the admissibility of the application, the applicant was called upon to appear before this Authority on 25.02.2020 vide memo no. 18 dated 17.02.2020, but neither the applicant appeared before the Authority nor did it seek any adjournment.

Since, the Authority for Advance Ruling is bound to pronounce ruling within 90 days of the receipt of application as per Section 98(6) of the CGST/HGST Act. The applicant cannot be granted any further opportunity of hearing. Hence, the application of Advance Ruling is rejected under Section 98(2) of the CGST/HGST Act.

FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, HARYANA

1. Brief Facts:

1.1 The applicant company M/s Hyco Enterprises is engaged in manufacturing of foot mats and is registered under the Goods and Services Tax with GSTIN 06AABCH8650B1ZW. The firm is located at Plot No. 127-128, Sector-37, Pace City-1, Gurugram, Haryana.

1.2 The applicant had filed application for seeking advance ruling on 04.12.2019 and had sought ruling on the following issues:-

a. To clarify the classification of foot/ floor mats which are designed to be used solely and principally only by motor vehicle manufacturers as par and accessories of motor vehicle and are made of Carpets falling under Chapter 57.

b. To clarify the classification of foot/ floor mats which are designed to be used solely and principally only by motor vehicle manufacturers as par and accessories of motor vehicle and are made of PVC Plastic falling under Chapter 39.

c. To clarify the classification of foot/ floor mats which are designed to be used solely and principally only by motor vehicle manufacturers as par and accessories of motor vehicle and are made of top layer of carpets falling under Chapter 56 and lower layer of PVC Plastic falling under Chapter 39.

3. Discussion:

3.1 In order to decide the admissibility of the application, the applicant was called upon to appear before this Authority on 25.02.2020 vide memo no. 18 dated 17.02.2020, but neither the applicant appeared before the Authority nor did it seek any adjournment.

3.2 Since, the Authority for Advance Ruling is bound to pronounce ruling within 90 days of the receipt of application as per Section 98(6) of the CGST/HGST Act. The applicant cannot be granted any further opportunity of hearing. Hence, the application of Advance Ruling is rejected under Section 98(2) of the CGST/HGST Act.

Download Judgment/Order

More Under Goods and Services Tax

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

March 2021
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031