Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Jayant Food Products (GST AAR Gujarat)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/65/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/09/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Jayant Food Products (GST AAR Gujarat)

Question: Under which tariff Heading PAPAD of different shapes and sizes manufactured/ supplied by the applicant would attract CGST and SGST?

Answer : The product ‘Un-fried Fryums’ manufactured and supplied by applicant is classifiable under Tariff Item 2106 90 99 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Goods and Services Tax rate of 18% (CGST 9% + GGST 9% or IGST 18%) is applicable to the product ‘Un-fried Fryums’ as per Sl. No. 23 of Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28-6-2017, as amended, issued under the CGST Act, 2017 and Notification No. 1/2017-State Tax (Rate), dated 30-6-2017, as amended, issued under the GGST Act, 2017 or IGST Act, 2017.

Read AAAR Ruling : Papad cannot be classified based on different shapes & sizes

FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING,GUJARAT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Black tiger says:

    How can the advance ruling be accepted when same matter is pending before honorable high court of Gujrat
    When matter is settle in Samantha food the ARR have given that it fall under 1905
    Where is one tax one national

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031