NI Act | Section 139 Presumption if signature on cheque is admitted

Triyambak S. Hegde Vs Sripad (Supreme Court)

Mr. Rajesh Inamdar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has contended that the signature on the documents at Exhibit P­6 and the cheque at Exhibit P­2 is not disputed by the respondent. In that view, it is contended that the learned JMFC was justified in raising a presumption against the respondent and convicting him since there was no rebuttal evidence or contrary material whatsoever. It is contended that the document at Exhibit P­6 was relied to indicate

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.