This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
NI Act | Section 139 Presumption if signature on cheque is admitted
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Triyambak S. Hegde Vs Sripad (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Triyambak S. Hegde Vs Sripad (Supreme Court)
Mr. Rajesh Inamdar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has contended that the signature on the documents at Exhibit P6 and the cheque at Exhibit P2 is not disputed by the respondent. In that view, it is contended that the learned JMFC was justified in raising a presumption against the respondent and convicting him since there was no rebuttal evidence or contrary material whatsoever. It is contended that the document at Exhibit P6 was relied to indicate that there was a transaction entered into between the parties towards ...




