Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22481 Results

Section 271C penalty not imposable if TDS was not deductible

Case Name : Satya Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : I.T.As No. 6301 & 6302/DEL/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/06/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Courts : All ITAT (14945) ITAT Delhi (3704)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Cash Payment cannot be treated as payment to single person merely for consolidated payments to group leader

Case Name : Rahul Udyog Vs ITO (ITAT Nagour)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 306/Nag./2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/06/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2013–14
Courts : All ITAT (14945) ITAT Nagpur (29)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

No Section 271(1)(b) penalty where assessment is completed u/s 143(3)

Case Name : Salasar Derivatives Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1916/Mum/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/06/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Courts : All ITAT (14945) ITAT Mumbai (3583)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

ITAT allows addition for cash deposit in bank on Peak Credit Basis

Case Name : Vakeel Ahmad Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 447/Lkw/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/06/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Courts : All ITAT (14945) ITAT Lucknow (120)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Depreciation on securities Available for Sale (AFS) is allowable claim

Case Name : Maninagar Co. Op. Bank Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1584/Ahd/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/06/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Courts : All ITAT (14945) ITAT Ahmedabad (1125)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Substantive additions on protective basis: ITAT restores matter back to AO

Case Name : ACIT Vs Zodiac Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No.3391/Del/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/05/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Courts : All ITAT (14945) ITAT Delhi (3704)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

No section 41(1) addition if liability not stood remitted or ceased

Case Name : ACIT Vs Foot Mart Retail India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 4278/Del/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/05/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Courts : All ITAT (14945) ITAT Delhi (3704)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

AO must give minimum 7 days notice to responds to Section 148 notice

Case Name : Highgrowth Commodities Trade Private Limited Vs PCIT (Meghalaya High Court)
Appeal Number : WP (C) No.161/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/06/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13931) Meghalaya High Court (16)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Reassessment based on re-appreciation of facts already available on record is invalid

Case Name : Bombay Real Estate Development Co. P. Ltd. Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA no. 513/Mum./2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/06/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2010–11
Courts : All ITAT (14945) ITAT Mumbai (3583)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Delay cannot be condoned simply for confusion of Assessee regarding the course of action

Case Name : Rajendra Venkat Reddy Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 06/PUN/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/06/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Courts : All ITAT (14945) ITAT Pune (714)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031