Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22504 Results

If there is lack of enquiry on part of A.O., provisions of section 263 can be applied

Case Name : Shiva Automobiles Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA No. 110/Agr./2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/04/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Agra (125)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Special Bench of ITAT on taxability of loss in case of forward foreign exchange contracts

Case Name : DCIT Vs. Bank of Bahrain & Kuwait (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 4404 & 1883/Mum/2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/08/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

One cannot read provision of section 249(4)(a) into section 253(1)(b)

Case Name : CIT Vs. Pawan Kumar Laddha (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal Nos. 8914- 8922 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/04/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2373)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Penalty u/s 271 on disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia)

Case Name : ACIT Vs. Bhoruka Logistics (P) Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : 2010) 34 (II) ITCL 552
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/05/2009
Related Assessment Year : 2005- 09
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Mumbai (3584)

Income deemed to accrue or arise in India

Case Name : Velankani Mauritius Ltd. & Ors. Vs Dy. DIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : (2010) 34 (II) ITCL 508
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/05/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Bangalore (1081)

Expression ‘liable to tax’ in contracting State as used in Article 4(1) of Indo-UAE-DTAA not necessarily imply that person should actually be liable to tax in that contracting State

Case Name : ITO (IT) Vs. Rameshkumar Goenka (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA No. 3562/Mum/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/04/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

It is obligatory on part of assessee to deduct TDS at the time of credit of interest income to account of payee or at time of payment thereof

Case Name : Rajendra Kumar Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1180/Bang./2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/02/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Bangalore (1081)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Provisions of section 194C not attracted to finance agreements between financing company and producers/directors of films/TV serials

Case Name : Entertainment One India Ltd. Vs. ITO (TDS) (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1095 to 1098/Mum/2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/06/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Mumbai (3584)

Reopening beyond 4 years on the basis of Supreme Court’s judgement not justified if assessee not failed to disclose material facts

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/s. Baer Shoes (India) Pvt. Ltd. (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Case (Appeal) No. 706 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/08/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13958) Madras High Court (1763)

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) leviable, even if no tax is payable by an assessee

Case Name : JCIT Vs Saheli Leasing & Industries Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 4278/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/05/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2373)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031