Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 2226 Results

Service tax – Exercise of revisional jurisdiction u/s. 84(4) when appeal preferred was not permissible

Case Name : Commissioner Of Central Excise Vs Shiva Builders (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : STA No. 51 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/04/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Punjab and Haryana HC (456)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

If applicant has no layout plan to examine the contentions that the activity carried out by them does not come under the purview of residential complex

Case Name : M/s Avn Build Tech (P) Ltd Vs Cs (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. ST/925/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/04/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Input service credit availed by assessee on outdoor catering available subject to that the assessee not charged anything from the employees

Case Name : Commissioner Of Central Excise Vs Indoworth (I) Ltd. (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ST/334 & 335/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/04/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Mumbai (507)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Service from mandap keeper during the course of advertising and publicizing the product is input service

Case Name : M/s Tradex Polymers Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE (CESTAT Ahemdabad)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ST/02/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/04/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)

Collection of electricity bills and telephone bills on behalf of electricity boards and telecom companies is not taxable under Business Auxiliary Service

Case Name : CCE Vs M/s Corporation Bank (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ST/115/2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/03/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Bangalore (304)

Service Tax – 20% restriction under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 not applicable to credit availed on capital goods

Case Name : M/s BSNL Vs CCE (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ST/132/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/03/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Bangalore (304)

Taxes on mineral rights- SC refers matter to Bench of nine-Judge

Case Name : Vs M/s Steel Authority of India & Ors (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal Nos. 4056-4064 of 1999
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/03/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

security at the guest house has no nexus or relation with the business of manufacture of assessees

Case Name : M/s Kilburn Chemicals Ltd Vs Commissioner Of Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. E/512/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/03/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Chennai (646)

Handling & transportation charges, supervision charges collected by ‘Storage and Warehousing’ provider liable for Service Tax under the category of ‘Cargo Handling Service’

Case Name : M/s Rajasthan State Warehousing Cotp Vs CCE (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ST/Misc No. 197/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/03/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Whether availment of credit of service tax paid on the insurance service to cover the damage or loss to the exported goods in the foreign countries except India is eligible as input service?

Case Name : M/s Harsha Engineers Ltd Vs CCE (CESTAT Ahemdabad)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. E/1805 & 1806/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/03/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031