Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 28 Results

Can’t allow Deposit of Old Notes After Dec 31, 2016: Centre To SC

Case Name : Victory Logitrans Pvt & Anr Vs Union of India & Ors (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition (Civil) No. 136 of 2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/04/2017
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (1156)

PML Act, 2002 Provisions cannot be invoked Retrospectively

Case Name : M/s Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt Ltd Vs Joint Director (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 5962 of 2016 (GM-MM-C)
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/03/2017
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5311) Karnataka High Court (261)

Transaction approved by RBI & Govt not sufficient & assessee has to benchmark royalty payment separately

Case Name : Sara Lee TTK Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA no.376/Mum/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2016
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Courts : All ITAT (6569) ITAT Mumbai (1949)

Firm or ‘firm name’ is merely a compendious description of all the partners collectively

Case Name : Overseas Textiles Corporation Vs Special Director, Enforcement Directorate (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Fera Appeal No. 56 to 61 OF 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/09/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5311) Bombay High Court (975)

Charges under FERA provisions can be framed on the basis of statement of co-accused

Case Name : S.K. Jain Vs M.G. Attri (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : CRL. REV. P. NO. 518 of 2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/05/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5311) Delhi High Court (1483)

Members cannot be appointed part-time to Fema Tribunal

Case Name : Union Of India And Others Vs S. Srinivasan (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 3185 of 2005 with Civil Appeal Nos. 3186-3190 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/05/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (1156)

FEMA – Claim for interest in the nature of compensation for wrongful retention of money is not maintainable

Case Name : Directorate Of Enforcement Vs. Subhash Muljimal Gandhi (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : LPA 669/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/02/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5311) Delhi High Court (1483)

SC asks Ketan Ketan Parikh and Co to Deposit deposit 50 percent of penalty imposed for Fema violations

Case Name : Ketan V. Parekh Vs. Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement and another (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 10301 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/11/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (1156)

Section 45(1A) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 – Binod Kumar Versus State of Jharkhand & Others

Case Name : Binod Kumar Vs State of Jharkhand & Others (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 2689 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/03/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (1156)

FERA- Where interest received by revenue was relatable to seized amounts from petitioners, which were invested in fixed deposits by revenue, petitioners would be entitled to accrued interest on such seized amounts

Case Name : R. K. Jewllers Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 2777 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/05/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5311) Bombay High Court (975)