Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22499 Results

Addition u/s. 68 cannot be deleted for mere payment if not supported by creditor’s confirmation

Case Name : Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Vs Verma Roadways (ITAT Lucknow)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 265 (LkW.) of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/07/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2003-04
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Lucknow (120)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Section 10B – Blending & processing of tea amounts to manufacturer

Case Name : Madhu Jayanti International Ltd. Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal Nos. 2039 (kol.) of 2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/07/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2003-04 and 2004-05
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Kolkata (1035)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Notice u/s 148 issued without sufficient reason to believe is invalid

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income Tax III Vs Shonkh Technology Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : + ITA 1325/2009, + ITA 525/2010, + ITA 1697/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

S. 80IC deduction not admissible on Interest Income

Case Name : Flex Foods Ltd. Vs. Deputy CIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No.4072/Del/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 22.06.2012
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Delhi (3706)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Assessment made by Settlement Commission cannot be reopened by a different authority

Case Name : M/s Omaxe Ltd Vs ASSTT. Commissioner of Income Tax and ANR. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. (C) No.7975/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Delhi High Court (3377)

ESOP – Difference Between Market & Offer Price is Deductible Expenditure

Case Name : CIT Vs PVP Ventures Limited (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : TC(A). No. 1023 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/06/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Madras High Court (1763)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

ITAT criticises AO for harnessing Assessee & imposed Penalty on A.O.

Case Name : Smt. Sushila Suresh Malge Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : IT(SS)A No.06/Mum/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)

S. 80GGB -AO to accept claim of assessee, though not claimed in original or revised return

Case Name : M/s. Britannia Industries Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1410/Kol/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/06/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2005-06
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Kolkata (1035)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Payments made for transmission of electricity by transmission lines do not constitute rent payment U/s.194-I

Case Name : Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. Vs DCIT TDS Range-2 (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A.No.2872/Mum/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/06/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

S. 80-IB(10) – Deduction can’t be denied just because Assessee did not construct himself

Case Name : Abdul Khader Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 57 (BANG.) OF 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/04/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Bangalore (1081)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031