Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22498 Results

Application of mind to material facts & arguments should manifest itself in order

Case Name : HHS India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Income-tax Officer (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA no.2700/Del/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/08/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Delhi (3706)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Tax need to be withheld if payer has right to terminate ‘secondment’ & not ’employment’

Case Name : Re. Target Corporation India (P.) Ltd. (AAR Delhi)
Appeal Number : A.A.R. No. 851 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/08/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (3746)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Deduction u/s. 80-IB(10) not available for housing complexes constructed after 31-3-2008

Case Name : Fortuna Foundation Engineer & Consultants (P.) Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax-IV, Lucknow (ITAT Lucknow)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 283 (LKW) OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/08/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Lucknow (120)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Section 88E do not put any restriction for allowing rebate u/s.88E till income is positive

Case Name : Shri Manish D. Innani Vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 861/Mum/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/08/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

To impose Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) receipt of amount in dispute must constitutes income of assessee

Case Name : Haren P Choksey Vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 3549/Mum/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/08/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2001-02
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Prior period Expenses not allowable

Case Name : M/s. Tipco Industries Ltd. Vs. The ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.5708/Mum/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/08/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2004-05
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Exemption U/s. Sec. 54EA available if initial amount received in kind is eventually invested

Case Name : Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle Vs Smt. Padmavathy (Karantaka High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 1147 of 2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/08/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13955) Karnataka High Court (635)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Section 54EC – Time Limit gets extended if specified bonds of assessees choice were not available

Case Name : Commissioner of Income-tax, Central - III Vs Cello Plast (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 3731 OF 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13955) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Gift by company to subsidiary are dubious & not tax neutral – AAR

Case Name : Re. Orient Green Power Pte. Ltd. (AAR Delhi)
Appeal Number : A.A.R. No. 973 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/08/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (3746)

It is mandatory for foreign company to file return of income to take benefit of DTAC – AAR

Case Name : Re. Castleton Investment Ltd. (AAR Delhi)
Appeal Number : AAR No. 999 of 2010: 14/08/2012
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (3746)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031