Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 1695 Results

Despite no financial hardship plea court may grant waiver of pre-deposit on merits

Case Name : A Plus Projects Technology (P.) Ltd. Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition (L) No. 2886 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/12/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14157) Bombay High Court (1906)

HC has power to condone delay beyond the period of 180 days if sufficient cause exists

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, GOA Vs General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Civil Application (Review) No. 7 & 8 OF 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/04/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14157) Bombay High Court (1906)

Interest is payable for delayed payment of taxes even if such default is otherwise revenue neutral

Case Name : Hindustan Zinc Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-II (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number :
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14157) Delhi High Court (3419)

Initiation of recovery proceedings during pendency of stay application is invalid

Case Name : Metlife India Insurance Company Ltd Vs The Union of India (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 2214, 3298-3299 & 3703-3711 OF 2013 (T-TAR)
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/03/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14157) Karnataka High Court (655)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Input service for construction of immovable property, which is rented admissible for cenvat credit

Case Name : Venus Investments Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Misc. Order No./M/1292 OF 2012-WZB/AHD
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Ahmedabad (818)

Classification of service cannot be changed in the hands of the recipient

Case Name : Max India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ST/1337-1338/2011-SM (BR)
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/06/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Delhi (916)

CBEC Tax Recovery Circular is untenable, misconceived, wholly illegal & arbitrary

Case Name : M/s PML Industries Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & another (Punjab and Hariyana High Court)
Appeal Number : CWP No. 877 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/02/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14157) Punjab and Haryana HC (459)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

If assessee not contested demand on ground of invocation of extended period of limitation, penalty is leviable

Case Name : Alloytech Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 701 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/11/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Bangalore (304)

Tribunal order giving effect to HC opinion cannot amount to review of its earlier order

Case Name : M/s Devta Steel Rolling Mills Vs The Commissioner of Central Excise (Punjab and Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : CEA No. 14 Of 2013 (O&M)
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/02/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14157) Punjab and Haryana HC (459)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Cenvat credit cannot be denied on ground that supplier had paid excess duty

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata-III Vs Kitchen Appliances India Ltd. (CESTAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : Order No. A-782/KOL./2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/10/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Kolkata (372)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031