Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 1687 Results

If marks are not affixed on goods then it cannot be said that brand-name has been affixed

Case Name : The Commissioner, Customs & Central Excise Vs M/s. Voltarc India (P) Ltd. (Andhra Pradesh High Court)
Appeal Number : C.E.A. No. 36 of 2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/06/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Andhra Pradesh HC (221)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Assessee not required to check beyond cenvatable documents for claiming Cenvat credit

Case Name : M/s. Shah Paper Mills Limited Vs CCE & ST, Daman (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : E/639,640/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/06/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Sterilization of syringes and needles not amounts to manufacture

Case Name : M/s Servo-Med Industries Private Limited Vs. CCE (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 583 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/05/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Trade discount quantified subsequent to clearance is an admissible deduction from transaction value – HC

Case Name : M/s Shyam Steel Industries & Anr. Vs Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax & Ors. (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : WP 299 of 2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/06/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Calcutta High Court (840)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Automobile cesses are a type of excise duty for which also rebate available under Rule 18

Case Name : M/s TVS Motors Co. Ltd. Vs Union of India And Others (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No.-51753/2013 & 38767-69/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/06/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Karnataka High Court (634)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

In case of clandestine removal, Department not required to establish with clear evidence as assessee deliberately destroyed records and preponderant of evidence is sufficient

Case Name : CCE Vs Sree Srinivasa Processing (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : E/442/2003 & E/CO/16/2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/05/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Chennai (646)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Input credit not allowed if Final Product exempt from Tax and such duty cannot be refunded

Case Name : The Commissioner, Customs & Central Excise Versus M/s. Surana Telecom Limited (Andhra Pradesh High Court)
Appeal Number : Central Excise Appeal No. 24 of 2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/04/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Andhra Pradesh HC (221)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Re-credit of CENVAT reversed on instructions of Revenue without any dispute is allowed

Case Name : Shree Rubber Plast Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. A/1077/15/SMB in Appeal No. E/458/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/04/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Mumbai (507)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Substantial benefit cannot be denied for mere procedural lapse: HC

Case Name : Commissioner Central Excise Commissionerate Vs M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd (Punjab and Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : CEA No. 44 of 2014 (O&M)
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/03/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Punjab and Haryana HC (456)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Can CESTAT dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution?

Case Name : Balaji Steel Re-Rolling Mills Vs Commissioner Of Central Excise And Customs (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 10265 Of 2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/11/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031