Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs M/s. Madras Cements Ltd. (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : C.M.A.No. 2291 of 2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/06/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs M/s. Madras Cements Ltd. (Madras High Court)

Madras High Court has dismissed an appeal against the CESTAT order wherein the Tribunal had set aside the penalty and allowed Cenvat credit on MS items used for fabrication of support structures, while remanding the matter for computation of credit. The Tribunal had held that since only the issue of interpretation was involved, imposition of penalty was unwarranted. The Department did not dispute the entitlement to such Cenvat credit before the High Court. The High Court held that the finding of the Tribunal relating to penalty were not beyond the scope of power of the Tribunal under Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It noted that the words ‘as it thinks fit’ under Section 35C(1) are wide enough to confer such power upon the Tribunal to exercise its discretion, while remanding the case only for the purpose of computation of Cenvat credit, for which the assessee was found entitled. It also held that so long as entitlement to avail Cenvat credit was not validly disputed by the Department, it cannot insist on an open remand.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGMENT

The Revenue, has filed the present appeal against the Respondent/Assessee, M/s.Madras Cement Limited aggrieved by the order dated 07.02.2018, by which, the learned CESTAT, Chennai allowed the appeal of the assessee and held that in view of the various judgments referred to in paragraph 5 of the order, the Assessee was entitled to avail cenvat credit on MS items/iron and steel used for fabrication of goods or support structures. For the purpose of computation of such cenvat credit, the matter was remanded back by the learned Appellate Tribunal to the Adjudicating Authority. Taking into account the aforesaid decisions, while doing so, the learned Tribunal, however held that since only the issue of interpretation was involved, the imposition of penalty in such cases was unwarranted and therefore, the penalties were set aside.

2. Paragraph 5 and 6 of the order of the learned Tribunal is quoted for ready reference:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031