Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Minimum penalty to be imposed under Central Excise Rules, 2002

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2008 taxguru.in 95
Case Name
CCE, Bhopal Vs M/s. Rama Wood Craft (P) Ltd. (CESTAT New Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Whether Rs.5000/- is a minimum penalty that is required to be imposed in terms of Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 ?

Even where a minimum penalty is prescribed, the authority has discretion to impose a lesser penalty depending on the facts and circumstances of the case.

The amount mentioned in Rule 173Q(1) of the 1944 Rules or Rule 25(1) of the 2002 Rules is the maximum, and not the minimum. The amount shall not exceed the duty determined; if it is more than rupees five thousand, or rupees five thousand if the duty determined  is  less  than rupees five thousand.

CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

SERVICE TAX APPEAL NO.464 OF 2007-SM(BR)
[Arising out of order-in-appeal No. 34/CE/BPL/2007  dated 18.6.2007 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Bhopal]

Date of Hearing: 17.03.2008
Date of Decision:  07 .04.2008

CCE, Bhopal

Versus

M/s. Rama Wood Craft (P) Ltd.  

O   R   D   E   R

Per Justice S.N.Jha:

1. This appeal has been referred to Larger Bench on the following question :-

“ Whether Rs.5000/- is a minimum penalty that is required to be imposed in terms of Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 ?”

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.