Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CC&CE, Kanpur Vs. M/s Beekay Enterprises (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 73 of 2007-SM
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/10/2006
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

Penalty can be imposed within the framework of Section 11AC of the Act.  Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules which deals with penalty also can be applied subject to provisions of Section 11AC.  As indicated above, penalty can be imposed when non payment or short payment of duty etc. was actuated by fraud, collusion, wilful mis-statement or suppression of facts or contravention of any of the provisions of the Act or rules made thereunder “with intent to evade payment of duty”. Even if a case of suppression of facts or contravention of any provision were made out, it is clear that suppression or contravention per se would not justify imposition of penalty unless it was made intentionally in order to evade payment of duty.

CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,NEW DELHI

Excise Appeal No. 73 of 2007-SM

[Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 514-CE/APPL/KNP/2006 dated 19.10.2006 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals-I) Customs & Central Excise, Kanpur]

Date of Hearing/ decision: 18.08.2008

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031