Case Law Details
Case Name : J.B.M. Auto Components Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Delhi
CESTAT, NEW DELHI BENCH
J.B.M. Auto Components Ltd.
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I
FINAL ORDER NO. ST/A/484 OF 2012-CUS
APPEAL NO. ST/486 OF 2006
JUNE 25, 2012
ORDER
Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Judicial Member
After hearing both sides, we find that the demand of Service Tax of Rs. 5,17,537/- stand confirmed against the appellant on the ground that during the period 2001-2002 and 2002-2003, they have provided management consultancy services to M/s. Krupp JBM Pvt. Ltd. Tamilnadu with whom they have entered into an agreement.
2. We find that Commissioner (Appeals) vide hi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
What could be considered as “reasonable Time” for passing Order after final Personal Hearing ?
Is there any circular / guidelines from CBEC / CESTAT about maximum time for issue of Adjudication Order after reserving the Order ?
What could be the affect of such delayed Order if issued after about 6 months of Personal Hearing ?