Case Law Details

Case Name : Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : 2015 (64) taxmann.com 20 (Allahabad)
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :

CA Bimal Jain

CA Bimal JainLiability of past Excise dues payable by old Company could neither be fastened nor be recovered from assessee when the assessee had only purchased assets of old Company, which was ordered to be wound up and had not taken over their running business

Facts:

Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (the Petitioner), had only purchased the assets of the U.P. State Cement Corporation Limited (the Corporation) in pursuance of the winding up order passed by the High Court, and had not taken over a running business of the Corporation. However, the Department alleged and demanded duty mainly on ground that, since the Petitioner had purchased a running business of the Corporation, the liability towards Excise dues payable by the Corporation accrued to the Petitioner under Section 11 of the Excise Act.

Held:

The Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad has held that in terms of the proviso to Section 11 of the Excise Act, where a person transfers or disposes of his business, which results in change of ownership, in that scenario, the successor, would be liable. However, in the instant case, the Corporation has not transferred or disposed of its business or trade. The Corporation has been wound up by an order of the High Court and its assets have been sold off. A running business of the Corporation has not been sold. Hence, the liability of past Central Excise dues payable by the Corporation cannot be fastened nor recovered from the Petitioner.

(Author can be reached at Email: bimaljain@hotmail.com)

Read Other Articles from CA Bimal Jain

More Under Excise Duty

Posted Under

Category : Excise Duty (4056)
Type : Articles (14970)
Tags : CA Bimal Jain (661) high court judgments (4093)

0 responses to “Excise dues payable by old Company cannot be recovered from assessee when assessee purchased only assets of old Company”

  1. M.Srinivas Kumar says:

    Dear Mr.C.A Bimal Jain.

    A very good judgement which is purely based on common business sense as the petitioner has only taken over the assets and not the entire business(with it’s attendent L.T/S.T. liabilities)

    Thanks for such srticles. Please keep it up.

    C.A/C.M.A M.Srinivas Kumar
    Bangalore

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *