Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commr. of Central Excise Vs Indian Steel & Wire Products Ltd. (CESTAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : Ex. Appeal No. 451 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/07/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Commr. of Central Excise Vs Indian Steel & Wire Products Ltd. (CESTAT Kolkata)

Appellant had entered into an agreement with TISCO for conversion of billets into wire rods for job of basis. After during the course of conversion, certain losses, such as burning losses occurred to the extent of 7%. Accordingly, appellants were required to return 90 tonnes of wire rods after conversion against every 100 tonnes of billets provided by TISCO. Whatsoever, waste arises during the course of conversion was also cleared by the appellant on payment of appropriate duty. The Revenue has issued Show Cause Notices alleging that the wire rods which were cleared from the premises of the appellants on the prices determined by the TISCO to the customers of the TISCO. However, while clearing they have not accounted for the waste and scrap that was arising during the process of conversion and retained by them. By addition of the value of such waste and scrap cleared by the appellant, the demand has been made.

Commissioner dropped the impugned show cause notices against which the Revenue is in appeal.

Undisputedly in the present case, the goods and wire rods have been cleared for payment of duty on the value fixed by the TISCO for whom appellants have performed the job work. Since the value adopted was the clearance of the goods as fixed by TISCO for the customer of Tisco it would have taken into account all the wastes including the value of waste and scrap retained by the appellants. All the components going into the value would have thus formed part of the assessable value for such clearances. It is not the case that job work charges have been suppressed to the extent of the value of waste and scrap in the present case as goods have been cleared on actual value fixed by TISCO.

CESTAT do not find any reason to defer from the said decision. In the result, there is no merit in the appeal. Impugned order is upheld and appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031