This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CESTAT unjustified in rejecting appeal for defect in appeal format: HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Principal commissioner of central tax Vs Pymen Cable (India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Principal Commissioner of Central Tax Vs Pymen Cable (India) (Delhi High Court)
Tribunal/CESTAT is utterly unjustified in rejecting the appeal before it on a hyper-technical ground i.e. an apparent defect in the appeal format. Ordinarily a judicial tribunal – like CESTAT is expected to permit rectification of such an obvious error; that it instead chose to dismiss the appeal altogether is shocking to say the least.
We have heard counsel for the parties and are of the opinion that the Tribunal/CESTAT is utterly unjustified in rejecting the appeal before it on a hyper-technical ground i.e. an ...






