pri CTF not made any effort to recover Excise/ Custom Duty: CAG Centralised Task Force not made any effort to recover Excise/ Custom Duty: CAG

Executive Summary of CAG Report No. 3 of 2017 Revenue Indirect Taxes Central Excise

Central Excise collection was Rs. 2,87,149 crore during financial year 2015-16 (FY 16) and accounted for 40 per cent of Indirect Tax revenue in FY 16.

This Report has 93 audit observations on Central Excise duties, having financial implication of Rs. 178.68 crore. The Ministry/Department had, till December 2016, accepted audit observations involving revenue of Rs. 132.13 crore and reported recovery of Rs. 30.44 crore. Some significant observations and findings are as follows: –

Chapter I: Department of Revenue – Central Excise

  • Central Excise revenue has shown 52 per cent growth in FY 16 compared to FY 15.

(Paragraphs 1.7)

  • During FY16, increase in Central Excise duty on petrol and high speed diesel led to overall growth of Central Excise.

(Paragraph 1.8)

  • Revenue forgone for FY16 in respect of Excise duties was 2,24,940 crore (Rs.2,05,940 crore as general exemptions and Rs. 19,000 crore as area based exemptions) which is 78.34 per cent of revenue from Central Excise.

(Paragraph 1.11)

  • Huge amount of Central Excise revenue amounting to Rs. 92,162 crore is under litigation at various levels. The amount is increasing every

(Paragraph 1.21)

Chapter II: Recovery of Arrears

  • Arrears of Central Excise increased by 50 per cent in 2014-15 as compared to 2012-13. However, the recovery of arrears has been showing a decreasing trend over the last three years. In Chennai-I Commissionerate, increase in arrears was 387.33 per cent.

(Paragraph 2.7)

  • In 37 test checked cases, under 12 Commissionerates, action for recovery under section 11 of Central Excise Act, 1944, and section 142 of Customs Act, 1962, were not taken, which resulted into non-recovery of Rs. 87 crore.

(Paragraph 2.8.2)

  • In 23 test checked cases, pending from 2 to 10 years involving revenue of Rs. 81 crore, in four Commissionerates, applications for early hearing were not filed.

(Paragraph 2.8.3)

  • If no recovery is made by Departmental efforts, cases need to be transferred to the Recovery Cells which have been empowered to take action for recovery by attachment and sale of property of the defaulter. No cases were transferred to the Recovery Cells in 23 Commissionerates during 2014-15, there were 15,388 cases amounting to Rs. 18,700.27 crore pending for recovery. Non-transfer of cases has not only resulted into Recovery Cells becoming redundant but has also led to piling of arrears and poor recoveries thereof.

(Paragraph 2.8.6)

  • The Board constituted, in 2004, a Centralised Task Force (CTF) to co-ordinate, facilitate, monitor and oversee the efforts of Customs and Central Excise field formations in recovery of arrears. We observed that though the Task Force was entrusted with finalising and implementing strategies for realisation of arrears it did not take any such action for realisation of arrears. As on March 2015, out of total arrears of Rs. 63,925.42 crore, cases involving arrears of Rs. 44,747.82 crore, Rs. 1,485.15 crore and Rs. 07 crore were pending with CESTAT, Commissioner (Appeals) and Settlement Commission respectively which constituted 72.44 per cent of total arrears for recovery.

(Paragraph 2.11.1)

Chapter III: Effectiveness of Internal Audit

  • We requisitioned 750 Assessee Master Files (AMF) and 1125 Internal Audit Files (IAF) out of which we received only 565 AMF and 1039 IAF Further five Commissionerates did not produce Audit Planning Register and Audit follow-up register during the period of audit. Poor maintenance of records by a wing which is the backbone of compliance verification mechanism reflects poorly on the functioning of the Department.

(Paragraph 3.6)

  • Draft Audit report of M/s Amritsar Crowns Cops (P) Ltd in Chandigarh and of M/s Young India Prestress Pvt. Ltd in Kolkotta Audit II Commissionerates were submitted with a delay of 331 and 241 days respectively.

(Paragraph 3.9.3)

  • We observed in eight Commissionerates, that out of a total 580 Internal Audit Files, no scoring had been done for evaluation of Audit Reports in 434 files. In three Commissionerates no scoring had been done in any of the Internal Audit Files.

(Paragraph 3.9.4)

  • Final audit report of M/s Kanchor Ingredients Ltd. In Kochin audit I and M/S Trimurti Fragrance Pvt. Ltd. in Delhi audit I Commissionerate were issued after a delay of 589 and 206 days respectively

(Paragraph 3.9.5)

Chapter IV: Non-compliance with Rules and Regulations

  • We observed 35 cases of irregular availing and utilisation of CENVAT credit, non/short payment of Central Excise duty involving revenue of Rs. 99 crore.

(Paragraph 4.1)

Chapter V: Effectiveness of Internal Control

  • We observed 56 instances of deficiencies in internal audit carried out by departmental officials and other issues involving revenue of Rs. 68 crore.

(Paragraph 5.1)

Source- Union Report 3 of 2017 Revenue Indirect Taxes Central Excise


More Under Excise Duty

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

July 2021