Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST &
Appeal Number : Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Date of Judgement/Order : Excise Appeal No. 71 of 2011
Related Assessment Year : 05/10/2021
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)

Cost fully amortized – additional casting cleared using same pattern – demanding continuation of amortization on additional casting legally unsustainable.

Facts-

The appellant received patterns from their customers to whom they supply the casting manufactured using the patterns. In one of the order the total cost of pattern was amortized and accordingly the appellant did not took into consideration the value of pattern while clearing the additional order.

To that, department contended that the appellant failed to include the amortized cost of patterns in respect of additional clearance in contravention of rule 4, 6 and 8 of Central Excise (No. 2) Rules, 2001.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031