Case Law Details
Case Name : Ericsson India Private Limited Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Ericsson India Private Limited Vs Commissioner, Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
CESTAT held that amount paid for the same duty but twice, one of the payment has to be refunded. Otherwise also in terms of section 17 of Limitation Act, whenever there is an application for a relief from the consequences of a mistake, the period of limitation would not begin to run until the plaintiff or applicant has discovered the mistake, or could with reasonable diligence, have discovered it. Since from this angle also, the bar of limitation is held
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.