Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sunita Commercials P Ltd Vs C.C (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sunita Commercials P Ltd Vs C.C (CESTAT Ahmedabad) CESTAT Ahmedabad held that Heading No.3102 1000 of the ITC (HS) Policy 2009-2015 allows import of Urea through STC, MMTC and Indian Potash Limited. Hence, goods cannot be held liable to confiscation. Consequently, no penalty u/s 112 can be imposed. Facts- Prior to 28-4-2015, under Heading No. 3102 1000 of the ITC (HS) Policy, import of Urea was allowed through STEs viz. STC, MMTC and Indian Potash Limited. The Government of India, Ministry of Chemical and Fertilizers had permitted the Appellant, Sunita Commercials P Ltd to import Technical Gra...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930