Duty paid under protest- Rejection of refund for time-bar is unsustainable

AGFA Healthcare Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)

On perusal of the documents, it is seen that there is no dispute that the appellant has paid excess duty of Rs.29,57,931/- after reassessment of the bills of entry by extending the benefit of Notification No. 12/2012-CE. The refund has been rejected on the ground that it is barred by limitation. When the appellant has approached the higher forum aggrieved by the rejection of the notification benefit, it is sufficiently implied that the duty has been paid un

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.