RBI’s Role in Mergers & Acquisitions: A Review of Cross-Border Financial Approvals

Introduction

The Indian cross-border mergers and acquisitions landscape has changed radically since the economic liberalization in 1991. The role of the Reserve Bank of India as the ultimate policymaker of foreign exchange transactions has become more complicated and pronounced due to the increased desire of Indian companies to explore global expansion opportunities and the greater interest of a foreign investor in Indian markets. The regulatory framework of RBI does not only control the way in which the cross-border M&A transactions can be approved, but also makes sure that it is in tandem with the overall economic policies of India and that it does not destabilize the financial system.

The cross-border M&A transactions are characterized by complex financial structures which normally involve the use of foreign exchange change, investments abroad or foreign direct investment into India. These are directly in the scope of the regulatory powers of the RBI in the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, as a direct replacement of the more oppressive Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. This method of control of such transactions by the central bank will refer to the gradual transition of India into a liberalized type of economy with the focus being placed more on controlling the business rather than preventing it, but enabling it to occur within a legitimate business environment.

The importance of the research on the role of RBI in cross-border M&A is more than just academic value. To corporate practitioners, the difference between winning the deal and wasted time may lie in the regulatory intricacies. To the policymakers, the effectiveness of existing frameworks can be analyzed to support future policies to balance between the economic growth and prudential regulation. The growing size and sophistication of cross-border transactions over the past years has underscored the advantages as well as the shortcomings of the current regulatory apparatus and hence the current study is especially timely in the business landscape nowadays.

POLICYMAKING DEVELOPMENT OF REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OF CROSS-BORDER M&A.

FEMA AND CROSS-BORDER TRANSACTIONS- 

The regulatory environment in which cross-border M&A in India is governed is grounded on the development of the foreign exchange management policies in general. Before 1991, the “Foreign Exchange Regulation Act” was very restrictive to the foreign exchange dealings which indicated the conservative attitude of the government to the liberalization of the external sector. This transfer to “FEMA (Foreign Exchange Management Act) 1999” was a paradigm shift in philosophy where prohibition with selective permission gave way to permission with selective prohibition. This philosophical change has had far-reaching impacts in the regulations of the cross-border of M&A transactions today.

According to the existing system, the main sources of the regulatory jurisdiction of the RBI in the domain of international M&A are various. The FEMA forms the essential legislative basis that enables the RBI to control all the foreign exchange transactions. [1]

SECTORAL CAPS AND FDI POLICY

The policy on Foreign Direct Investment, which is devised by the “Department of Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade” and executed by the “RBI”, puts restrictions on the sectoral limits of foreign investments and the entry of foreign investments. The caps have direct effects on cross-border approvals of M&A since such transactions have to meet sectoral and entry route restrictions.[2]

ODI GUIDELINES

In case of outbound investment by Indian companies, “Overseas Direct Investment (ODI)” regulations of RBI accessed “Liberalized Remittance Scheme (LRS)” and individual rules on ODI regulate the approval. These regulations provide the extent of investments, disclosure regulations and compliance measures in case of an Indian entity acquiring overseas.[3]

The regulatory framework has been changing with a lot of amendments and policy reforms, taking the response to the change in the economic conditions and market developments. Automatic route introduction on most sectors has made the regulation of the standard transactions in most sectors to be minimized with the intense regulation on sensitive sectors and complexity structure.

APPROVAL MECHANISMS AND COMPLIANCE ARCHITECTURE OF RBI

The approval process of cross-border M&A transactions has a multi-tiered framework by which, different types of transactions are distinguished on the basis of their size, sectoral categorization and complexity in structure. Those transactions which fall within automatic route do not need prior approval but should satisfy the stipulated conditions and reporting requirements. These usually encompass investments in non-sensitive sectors under well laid limits, as per the common structures and documents provisions. This automatic route has been gradually extended to encompass majority of the sectors which is the confidence that RBI has in the market to self – regulate within the stated parameters.

Where approval must be given before the transaction, RBI has put in place elaborate procedures balancing between due diligence and fair processing schedules. Most approval often goes through a series of steps of scrutiny where the initial step is the checking of the applications in terms of completeness and meeting up of the minimum requirements. This is followed by:

– critical analysis of the business case.

– financial implications

– adherence to the policies of the sector.

– congruence with the overall economic goals.

The style of the central bank is based on content and not form, which is based on the economic value and compliance instead of a mere technical compliance with the documentation requirements.[4]

The compliance architecture does not just stop at the stage of approval, but also covers the monitoring and reporting requirements. When companies get into cross border M&A transactions, they are required to come up with periodic reports that outline how the granted funds are utilized, performance of acquired companies and how many conditions stipulated in the process of approvals are adhered to. Such an all-inclusive compliance monitoring strategy assists RBI to continue overseeing the cross-border investing environment without imposing restrictions on the business players to continue with the operations that are within the scope of legal business goals.

REGULATORY CHALLENGES AND CASE STUDY ANALYSIS.

An analysis of notable cross-border M&A deals, which have influenced the regulatory thought and formulation of policy, would be the most appropriate way to think about the operational process of the RBI regulatory regime. The “Tata Motors purchase of Jaguar Land Rover[5]” in the year 2008 was a landmark event in the history of cross-border M&A in India and was a good indication of the potential and complexities of massive overseas acquisitions by Indian firms. This deal had to be structured in an innovative manner to meet overseas investment restrictions as well as to provide sufficient financing flexibility to the acquiring firm.

In the same vein, the “Acquisition of Zain African operations by Bharti Airtel”[6] presented the complexity of multi-jurisdictions deals and the coordination required in regulatory responses. The structure of the transaction entailed numerous regulatory approvals in various jurisdictions which underscores the relevance of regulatory predictability and clarity in carrying out multilateral cross-border transactions.

These historic deals have added to the development of the RBI attitude towards large-scale cross-border M&A, which have given rise to more subtle policies that can serve legitimate business purposes without sacrificing regulatory control.

ANALYSIS

The overall examination of the role of RBI in regulating cross-border M & A shows that the regulatory structure has been able to keep up with the changing economic demands of India and at the same time provide prudential control of the external sector. The transformation of a restrictive regime by FERA to more liberal regime by FEMA serves as evidence that the central bank is capable of balancing various policy goals, which are capital management of the account, industry policy realization, financial system stability, and enabling legitimate business operations.

The strengths of the existing regulatory framework are that it addresses a wide variety of transaction structures; it is also risk based in its approvals, it is also integrated with other economic policy outcomes; as well as responsive to market changes. The continuous process of liberalization of sectoral caps, simplification of procedures, and the emergence of digital infrastructure have greatly facilitated ease of doing business to companies involved in the cross-border M&A operations. This flexibility of the framework in supporting innovative structure of transactions whilst preserving regulatory control has helped Indian firms to undertake strategic acquisition in other parts of the world as well as foreign direct investment in Indian markets.

SUGGESTIONS

RBI, according to the analysis of its regulatory framework, as well as its practice, makes some recommendations that could be made to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the cross-border regulation of M&A.

• The publication of uniform processing schedules of different categories of applications on RBI will increase market confidence and planning of transactions.
• Routine and complex cases should have fast-track routes and milestone routes respectively.
• The expansion of a digital infrastructure, such as AI tools, would decrease delays and increase the level of transparency.
• Systemic problems can be prevented by greater stakeholder participation and compliance can be facilitated by better coordination between regulators.

The combination of these measures can enhance the efficiency of the regulatory activities of RBI without interfering with prudential regulation.

CONCLUSION

The regulatory mechanism of RBI on cross-border M&A has developed into a complex mechanism that is able to manage the conflicting needs of economic liberalization and prudential regulation. The move by the central bank is an indication of a well-developed appreciation of the contribution that trans borders investment flows make to economic development and the necessity of ensuring that adequate provisions are made against the possibility of risks that may arise. The development of the framework as a restrictive controls framework to be a risk-based regulation can be seen as institutional learning and adaptability, which has benefited the Indian economic interests effectively.

The existing regulatory framework offers sufficient coverage of the different forms of transactions and structures but is flexible to accommodate new developments in the market. There is the convergence of sectoral policies, foreign exchange management and prudential regulation which forms a holistic framework of the multidimensionality of cross-border M&A transactions. The latest technological advances and simplification of the procedures have facilitated the user experience without compromising the regulatory efficacy.

In the future, the framework will be successful based on its capability to suit the market changes, technology changes, and business practices changes. The facilitation/ regulation ratio that defines the current strategy seems justified in the level of economic development India is at present, and it offers strong ground to further development of cross-border business operations without jeopardizing the stability of the financial system and the external balance of the sector.

*****

[1] Archana Rao, “Cross-Border M&A in India: 2024 Market Developments and Regulatory Changes”, India Briefing, 2024 – https://www.asiabriefing.com/personnel/archan-rao.html

[2] UJA, “Legal and Commercial Aspects of Global Trade for Indian Businesses in Cross-Border Transactions and Mergers & Acquisitions”, April 2025, https://uja.in/blog/legal-chronicle/cross-border-ma-trade-regulations-guide-for-indian-firms/

[3] ICSI, “Economic, Business and Commercial laws”, module 2;  paper (2019)  http://www.icsi.edu/

[4] Dinesh Kanabar, “ M&A In India Tax and Regulatory Perspective”, Dhruva Advisors (2023) https://www.dhruvaadvisors.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/MnA-in-India-Tax-and-Regulatory-Perspective.pdf

[5] Dr Mohd I M Alnajjar, “Cross Border Acquisition of Jlr: A Boon or Pain for Tata Motors” Journal of International Business and Economics, 9(2), 21-30, (2019) – https://www.researchgate.net/journal/Journal-of-International-Business-and-Economics-2378-9174?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19

[6] Sanjay Dhir, “Integration of knowledge and enhancing competitiveness: A case of acquisition of Zain by Bharti Airtel”, Journal of Business Research, Vol 119, 674-684, (Oct 2020) – https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-business-research