Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohammed Akmam Uddin Ahmed Vs Commissioner Appeals Customs and Central Excise (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 1242/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/04/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Mohammed Akmam Uddin Ahmed Vs Commissioner Appeals Customs and Central Excise (Delhi High Court)

Delhi High Court held that Court has the power to exercise discretion to waive requirement of pre-deposit of penalty in rare and deserving cases.

Facts- The present Petition has been filed by the Petitioners, inter-alia, challenging the constitutional vires of Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”] and seeking a direction to Respondents to admit the Appeal filed by the Petitioners without pre-deposit of the mandatory duty as stipulated in Section 129E of the Act.

The Petitioners have submitted that they belong to poor families and live in Islam Nagar, Hojai, Assam, and are not well-educated youth. In support of their plea, the Petitioners No. 1 and 3 have filed an income certificate dated 13.12.2021 issued by the Office of the Circle Officer, Hojai, Assam, showing an annual income of Rs. 1,00,000/-. The Petitioners further stated that they are earning their livelihood through agriculture and by selling small quantities of Agarwood. The Petitioners have submitted in the Petition that the goods seized by the Customs Authorities were purchased by them, and the bills were attached to the Reply to the Show Cause Notice. The Petitioners have also stated that the goods seized were wrongly assessed at very high market value, and the penalty has been levied based on an incorrect assessment of the goods. The Petitioners have further submitted that their right of Appeal under Section 129E of the Act cannot be exercised as they are not financially sound and hence, unable to pay the mandatory pre-deposit as required to challenge this levy.

Conclusion- Held that the Court has the power to exercise discretion to waive requirement of pre-deposit of penalty in rare and deserving cases where a clear justification is made out for interference. In the present case, no proper calculation has been made for the penalty levied. The penalty imposed on the Petitioners has been imposed based on a provisional valuation. The penalty imposed is therefore without any legal basis and cannot be sustained.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031