Case Law Details
Hazel Mercantile Ltd Vs Chief Commissioner Of Customs (Gujarat High Court)
At this stage, Mr. Nankani made two fold fervent appeals. He made a request that the earlier bond, which was furnished by his client to the respondent No.1 should be returned as the writ applicant has now been asked to furnish a fresh bond. Let the first bond which was furnished by the writ applicant to the respondent No.1 be returned. The second request is that with passage of time, the goods must have suffered some wear and tear including evaporation being in a liquid form. He makes a request that the demurrage charges etc. may be waived.
In the above regard, we permit the writ applicant to make such request to the respondent No.1. The respondent No.1 shall consider the request having regard to the overall background (including delay) of the matter and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law expeditiously.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF GUJARAT HIGH COURT
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
