Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Vs Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd. (CESTAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Vs Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd. (CESTAT Kolkata)

Introduction: In the case of Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) vs. Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd., the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) appeals have been dismissed as a result of a significant order by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). This article delves into the details of the case and the subsequent legal proceedings.

Detailed Analysis:Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

1.Chartered Accountant with 20 years experience in the area of Indirect Taxation, Litigation 2.Management, Accounts, Costing, Budgeting, Audit, Commercials, System Implementations etc. 3.A Qualified Insolvency Professional, Company Secretary and Fraud Examinor. 4.Member of Confederation of Indian View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Shipping Bills Cannot Be Finalized Based on Delayed CRCL Test Report (218 Days): Kolkata CESTAT CESTAT Kolkata allows 12% Interest for 15-Year Refund Delay CESTAT Allow Interest @12% for Delay of 15 years in granting Export Duty Refund in account of Inaction by Kolkata Customs Iron Ore Export- CRCL/Customs Lab report cannot be basis for Final Assessment CESTAT Orders Proper Delivery of Final Order to Vedanta View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31