Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Vishnu Processors Vs Union of India and others (Punjab and Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : CWP No. 25129 of 2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/03/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shri Vishnu Processors Vs Union of India (Punjab and Haryana High Court)

Issue under consideration is whether the Search and resultant seizure of documents and record by Director of Revenue Intelligence is justified under Customs Act, 1962?

In the present case, the petitioner is engaged in the supply of input to M/s Worldwide Tradelinks and M/s NMR Knitfab Private Limited. In an ongoing investigation upon M/s Worldwide Tradelinks and M/s NMR Knitfab Private Limited for availing ineligible drawback and IGST by way of accumulating ITC, a search was also conducted by the Director of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) in the factory premises of Petitioner leading to the seizure of their records and preparation of panchnama in relation to such search proceedings. Hence, writ petition filed requesting quashing of panchnama.

The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner was that panchnama should be quashed as officials of Director of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) had no jurisdiction to conduct search at the premises of the petitioner as he is not an exporter. The argument is that investigation is with regard to Ludhiana dealer and in case of any doubt or dispute it was only the officials of Goods & Service Tax Department who could have proceeded further in the matter so far as the petitioner is concerned.

High Court states that the section 105 of Customs Act is widely worded and search can be conducted if the Assistant or Deputy Commissioner of Customs has reasons to believe that there are any document or thing which in his opinion will be useful or relevant to any proceedings under this Act or secreted at any place. The section does not restrict the search only with regard to importer or exporter, the other premises can also be searched. The petitioner was a supplier/seller to the exporters at Ludhiana, there was an investigation that ineligible drawback etc. had been claimed by procuring only the bills without there being transfer of goods, this establishes the relevance of search with proceedings under the Act.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031