SEBI penalty on Deccan Chronicle’s Company Secretary overturned. Tribunal rules Company Secretary not responsible for verifying audited financial statements in buyback offer.
Explore recent SAT verdict in 20 Microns Limited v. BSE Limited case on Regulation 17(1A) of LODR. Learn about implications and a balanced approach to compliance.
Dive into the Shreehas P Tambe vs. SEBI case, exploring insider trading regulations, violations, legalities, and the significant SAT decision.
Explore the impact of the redesignation of independent directors in the SAT ruling – SecureKloud Technologies Limited vs. SEBI. A detailed analysis of violations, penalties, and regulatory compliance.
Vedanta Limited secures a victory as the Securities Appellate Tribunal overturns SEBI’s fine. Details of the Cairn India buyback case.
A detailed analysis of SAT Mumbai’s decision to reduce SecureKloud Technologies’ penalty for non-serious LODR violations, and its impact on regulatory compliance.
Regulation 17(1A) is not applicable for the purpose of filling up a casual vacancy under Section 161(4) of the Companies Act. Regulation 17(1A) cannot be read in isolation.
SAT held that annual listing fee payable inspite of suspension on Trading of Securities. Listing & trading of securities are distinct terms
Held that a perusal of Clause 36 of the listing agreement provides for a company to inform the exchange on immediate basis of all events which will have a bearing on the performance/ operations of the company as well as price sensitive information.
Pranshu Bhutra Vs SEBI (Securities Appellate Tribunal Mumbai) 1. The present appeal has been filed questioning the confirmatory order dated 15th September, 2021 confirming the ex-parte ad-interim order dated 31st May, 2021 whereby the appellant was restrained from buying or selling any securities, either directly or indirectly, till further orders. 2. The facts leading to […]
