In a landmark decision, Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (KRERA) orders builders to allot common areas to homebuyers, addressing long-standing concerns of Karnataka Home Buyers’ Forum.
MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY Order No. 29/2022 Date 25/04/2022 No. MahaRERA/Secy/File No.27/ 108 /2022 Sub: – Standard Operating Procedure for filing cases arising from Regulatory functions of MahaRERA Whereas, Government of India has enacted the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (the Act) and all sections of the Act have come into force […]
Vrajesh Hirjee Vs Skyline Construction Co. (RNA Exotica) (Maharashtra RERA) The respondents have mentioned various reasons in their reply which caused delay in completing the project. Even if it is taken for granted that they are the genuine reasons which are beyond the control of the respondents, the respondents cannot claim the extension of more […]
Rajasthan RERA Holds RERA Act As Mandatory And Directs For Execution of Agreement For Sale For Property Sold By Auction By State Development Authorities In a landmark decision, the Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority (‘RERA”) on September 22, 2020 has held that Section 13 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“Act”) is […]
This appeal is directed against the order dated 10th December, 2018 of Ld. Member and Adjudicating Officer, MahaRERA as modified by order dated 11th March, 2019 pursuant to Review Application filed by Appellant in Complaint Nos. SC10000672 & SC10000691.
Since the complainant is also a party to the said proceeding , he can not separately agitate this complaint before the MahaRERA, as it will amount to agitate multiple proceedings on the same issue, which is not permissible in RERA Act, 2016. In the present case since the MahaRERA has already given judgment in the proceeding filed by the complainant through the Rising City Ghatkopar Association, the same issue can not be agitated before the MahaRERA again.
The complainant, who is a resident in a completed building in the above registered project, has filed this complaint seeking directions of MahaRERA to the respondent to allow him to park his vehicle inside the compound wall of the building. The Complainant has further alleged that the Respondent is selling open car parking by collecting in cash without any documentation.
In, Avinash Saraf versus Runwal Homes Private Limited case, the landmark judgement given by MAHARERA, Mumbai, having complaint number 32, Dated 13th October 2017. Final judgement is given by Honorable Shri B. D.KAPADNIS.
