Held that benefit of carried forward business losses and unabsorbed dep. u/s. 72A available only if the amalgamation/demerger is genuine
Term two years has been interpreted to mean that not during the whole period of two years, even if the land is used for some days in the earlier year, it would be sufficient for compliance of provisions of section 54B
Held that assessee had failed to satisfy the conditions precedent to claim as revenue expenditure, as the expenditure was incurred during the previous year relevant to the assessment year under consideration. Therefore, the claim cannot be allowed as deduction
Jaykumar Mangilal Nagori Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) It is indisputable that the assessee could not lead any evidence to demonstrate that the user of the car was restricted only to business purposes and did not percolate for personal use. Even the auditor has also mentioned that the personal element in vehicle expenses could not be […]
Urmila Madhukar Ved Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) This appeal by the assessee emanates from the order passed by the CIT(Appeals)-7, Pune on 11-09-2019 in relation to the assessment year 2010-11. 2. The only issue raised in this appeal is against the denial of exemption u/s.54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) […]
Shrikrishna Khandsari Sugar Mills Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) The only issue raised in this appeal is against the confirmation of disallowance of Rs.4,19,970/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) in respect of agricultural expenses. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee has been engaged in manufacturing and trading in Khandsari sugar […]
Rental income received from unsold portion of property constructed by a real estate developer, is assessable as ‘Income from house property’
Mohammad Bhai Esufali & Sons Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) The only dispute is about wastage/evaporation claimed by the assessee at 1.23%/0.89%. These figures have emerged from the tabulation made in the impugned order on page 4, where the assessee gave a comparative analysis showing that the wastage/shortage in the immediately preceding year was higher at […]
Vasanthan Mukundan Peedikakkandy Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) At the outset, we note that this appeal was filed with a delay of 931 days before the CIT(A). An affidavit filed explaining the said delay which is reproduced by the CIT(A) in impugned order at page Nos.11 to 13. On perusal of the same, we note that […]
ITAT held that transaction of receipt of donation is a sham, a make believe story, a device adopted by appellant society to bring on record undisclosed income
