Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandrakant Tatoba Patil Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune)
Appeal Number : ITA No.315/PUN/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/02/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2017-2018
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Chandrakant Tatoba Patil Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune)

ITAT noted that on an examination of the assessment record, the PCIT found abnormal increase in cash deposits during demonetization period as compared to pre-demonetization period. According to the PCIT, during the period from 09-11-2016 to 31-12-2016, the assessee deposited cash amounting to Rs.1,43,81,225/- which is inclusive of an amount of Rs.74,88,867/- from Smt. Manisha Patil. There was no evidences in support of cash deposits made during de-monetization period to an extent

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31