Tribunal ruled that unexplained cash deposits of ₹13.46 lakh by a mobile phone trader require fresh examination. ITAT emphasized natural justice and allowed the assessee to submit audited accounts and sales evidence.
The ITAT Pune ruled in the case of Nanasaheb Bhagawan Sasar vs. ITO that an assessee is entitled to a full Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) credit, even if the buyer mistakenly deducted the entire amount in the assessee’s name for a joint property sale.
ITAT Pune has sent the case of Shankar Saybu Rakhewar back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for a new hearing.
The ITAT Pune has ruled that co-operative societies can claim tax deductions under Section 80P for interest income from deposits with co-operative banks. The decision confirms a consistent judicial view, restoring the full deduction for the assessee.
Relying on Malabar Industrial, Max India, and Gabriel India precedents, ITAT ruled that when two views are possible, PCIT cannot assume jurisdiction. Original assessment for AY 2020-21 was restored.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Pune dismissed an appeal by the Income Tax Department, affirming that a cooperative credit society was not liable for unexplained cash credits under Section 68.
The ITAT Pune bench has deleted an addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, ruling that a cooperative credit society’s deposits of old currency during demonetization, received from its members, cannot be treated as unexplained income.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune, dismissed the Income Tax Officer’s appeal against Ambika Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari Patsanstha, affirming that cash deposits received during the demonetization period were not unexplained cash credits.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Pune has ruled that a validly approved gratuity fund’s income exemption under Section 10(25)(iv) cannot be denied due to a technical error, such as quoting a wrong section in the income tax return (ITR) or the non-filing of Form 10B.
The ITAT Pune bench partially allows the appeal of Avin Gopal Chotiya, upholding the disallowance of excess HRA claimed due to a shared rent agreement but deleting additions.
